A. Omarkhanov
To Win
J. Szajrych
To Win
Amir Omarkhanov vs Federico Cina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L W L W W
Form
W W W W W L W L L WH2H: Omarkhanov 0 - 0 Cina
| Omarkhanov | Stats | Cina |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (5-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 79% (11-3) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 373 |
| Highest Rank | 371 | |
| 17 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 47% (9-10) | Career Total W/L | 59% (44-30) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $35,260 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
Upcoming Match
- / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Omarkhanov VS Cina H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Amir Omarkhanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Amir Omarkhanov
Player
Saveliy Ivanov
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
78)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amir Omarkhanov
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Amir Omarkhanov
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amir Omarkhanov
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Moraing
Player
Amir Omarkhanov
57%
(
75 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
68 of
115)
3
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
11
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
37%
(
21 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
48%
(
63 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
125
Total Points Won
122
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Ouakaa
Player
Amir Omarkhanov
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
102)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(7) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Amir Omarkhanov
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amir Omarkhanov
Player
Luca Castagnola
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amir Omarkhanov
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
109)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
96
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Amir Omarkhanov
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Cina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Federico Cina
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Federico Cina
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Francisco Comesana
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
3
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Federico Cina
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Aslan Karatsev
45%
(
28 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Ergi Kirkin
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
20 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47% (9/10) | Win/Loss | 59% (44/30) |
| 44% (19/24) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (96/68) |
| 46% (193/223) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (818/744) |
| 50% (7/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (29/18) |
| 50% (2/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (15/12) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 56 | Aces Total | 179 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 74 | Total Double Faults | 188 |
| 1:53:3 | Average Match Time | 1:42:6 |
| 523.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.8 |
| 59% (810/1376) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3000/4931) |
| 66% (532/810) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2032/3000) |
| 42% (240/566) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (983/1931) |
| 41% (54/133) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (232/554) |
| 41% (542/1335) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2128/5128) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 45% (10/12) |
| 53% (8/7) | Futures W/L | 65% (32/17) |
| 47% (9/19) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (43/72) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (4/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 80% (20/25) |
| 80% (4/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (9/18) |
| 88% (8/7) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (45/38) |
| 13% (8/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (45/7) |
| 18% (11/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (29/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
